Are You OK With This?

About

Trump's Name Confirmed in Epstein Files: Is 'Playboys Together' the Whole Story?

Wednesday, December 17, 2025

📝 In a few words:

Chief of Staff confirms Trump in Epstein files, dismisses it as 'young playboys.' Oversight? Are you okay with this?

The Full Story

Big News Alert

President Donald Trump's chief of staff, Susie Wiles, has confirmed a deeply troubling revelation: the President's name appears in the infamous "Epstein file." This admission comes as the public eagerly awaits the full release of documents related to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, mandated by an act of Congress signed by Trump himself. Wiles's defense is that while he's "in the file," he wasn't doing "anything awful," dismissing his association with Epstein as merely being "young, single playboys together."

This explanation, offered years after Epstein's crimes and death, raises more questions than it answers. It minimizes the gravity of Epstein's actions and the company he kept. Are we truly to believe that association with a convicted sex offender can be brushed aside as mere youthful indiscretion, especially from someone holding the highest office in the nation?

What Could Go Wrong

This narrative, framing Trump's presence in Epstein's orbit as innocent "playboy" behavior, is a dangerous attempt to normalize serious connections. It risks undermining the public's trust in the integrity of ongoing investigations and the transparency of government. When high-ranking officials offer such casual explanations for deeply concerning associations, it suggests a lack of accountability and a willingness to downplay potentially compromising information.

The true danger lies in the precedent this sets. If powerful figures can dismiss their involvement with known criminals as just "partying," it erodes the very foundations of justice and oversight. What other uncomfortable truths might be glossed over, and what message does this send about who is truly held responsible in America?

Who Must Answer

Susie Wiles must answer for why this specific, benign characterization is being offered now, on the eve of file releases. Her statement also ironically contradicts President Trump's own claims about Bill Clinton's alleged Epstein island visits, which she admitted had "no evidence." This internal contradiction highlights a disturbing trend of convenient truth-telling.

Ultimately, President Trump must answer for the full extent of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The American people deserve to know the truth without politically motivated spin or attempts to frame decades-long associations as simple "playboy" antics. Accountability cannot be a selective process.

Your Call

With the full "Epstein file" disclosure imminent, are you comfortable with the White House's preemptive narrative?

"They were, you know, sort of young, single, whatever — I know it’s a passé word but sort of young, single playboys together."
Is this explanation sufficient for a President of the United States, whose name is confirmed to be in the records of a convicted sex trafficker? Are you okay with this dismissal of serious concerns?

Share this story

Choose how you want to share this article

🌐 https://areyouokwiththis.com
📰 Trump's Name Confirmed in Epstein Files: Is 'Playboys Together' the Whole Story?
📝 In a few words:
Chief of Staff confirms Trump in Epstein files, dismisses it as 'young playboys.' Oversight? Are you okay with this?
🔗 Read more: https://areyouokwiththis.com/article/trump-name-confirmed-epstein-files-playboys-story