Big News Alert

Elon Musk’s highly publicized Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) promised to revolutionize federal operations and slash trillions from the budget. However, by the end of 2025, the reality is starkly different: federal spending increased by nearly 6%, reaching an astonishing $7.558 trillion.

This surge in outlays occurred despite a significant 9% reduction in the federal workforce, which saw over 270,000 jobs eliminated. The core promise of fiscal prudence and responsibility has demonstrably failed, leaving taxpayers with a bigger bill and fewer public servants.

What Could Go Wrong

This outcome exposes a dangerous misconception: the belief that a high-profile figure can simply apply corporate tactics to fundamentally restructure government without unintended consequences. It highlights a profound misunderstanding of complex public finance mechanisms.

The emphasis on workforce cuts, while seemingly efficient, failed to address the true drivers of government spending, such as mandatory programs like Social Security and escalating interest payments on the national debt. This means the vital services for the American people could be diminished, while the underlying fiscal issues are left to fester and grow.

Furthermore, the dismantling of agencies like USAID centralizes power within other departments, potentially reducing independent oversight and crucial international outreach. This could lead to a less transparent and less effective government, ultimately undermining American interests abroad and at home.

Who Must Answer

President Donald J. Trump and his administration must be held accountable for championing an initiative that not only fell dramatically short of its promised goals but oversaw a significant increase in federal spending. Where was the critical oversight? What assurances were given to the American people?

Elon Musk, who celebrated the workforce reductions even as he admitted he wouldn't repeat the experience, needs to explain how a 6% spending increase aligns with his core mission to eliminate waste. His much-touted solution resulted in a larger government expense, not a smaller one.

The political leaders who promoted this narrative of