Can the Military Use Force Against Protesters?
Sunday, November 23, 2025
In a few words:
Debate over the use of active-duty military against domestic protesters and legal limits on presidential orders.
More details:
This segment from a transcript features a tense exchange between a senator and a legal representative regarding the potential deployment of active-duty military, specifically the 82nd Airborne, into American cities to quell protests. The senator questions whether any city is in active insurrection and presses for a clear stance on whether the military should use force, such as shooting at the legs of unarmed protesters, if ordered by the Commander-in-Chief.
The legal representative cites historical precedents, mentioning the 1970s and the Pentagon's involvement, suggesting the president has authority to use federal troops to protect federal functions and property. However, when directly asked if they would push back against an order to shoot unarmed protesters, the response focuses on ensuring the president's directives comply with the Constitution and law, rather than a direct 'yes' or 'no' to defying the order. The exchange highlights the complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding the use of military force domestically and the concept of speaking 'truth to power'.
Video Transcript
So right now by your legal determination
is any city in America in active
insurrection? Yes or no?
>> Senator, uh the president has not
declared that any insurrection is
>> Would you support the president in the
last administration asked then Secretary
Esper to send in the 82nd Airborne, the
same unit into uh the Washington DC to
try and quell peaceful protests here in
the city? And he said if necessary,
can't you just quote shoot at their
legs? Do you support the 82nd Airborne
active duty military troops being sent
into American cities today?
>> Senator, um it's my understanding the
Department of Justice has looked at this
issue going back to the 1970s when the
Pentagon was under duress uh as well as
Washington DC and it was the opinion
then that the president would have the
authority to use federal troops to
protect federal functions and property
in a manner
>> federal property. We get we get that's
I'm not dis disputing that. Would you
approve as a lawyer for the army? Would
you approve the 82nd Airborne an army
unit shooting at the legs of unarmed
protesters or would you push back
against the commander-in-chief against
that order?
>> Senator, I would say that the rules, the
current rules for the use of force that
uh US Northcom allows for uh service
members.
>> I mean, you said you were going to speak
truth to power. You literally just
answered Secret Sen Senator Kelly and
said you would speak truth to power. If
the president of the United States asked
you to quote shoot at the legs of
unarmed protesters, yes or no, would you
speak truth to power and say something
in push back to the president?
>> I would certainly make sure that the
president's directives would comply with
Constitution and law.
>> Okay. Uh I yield back.
Comments